Am 13.11.2011 15:32, schrieb Frank Gevaerts:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 01:13:47AM +1100, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
>> On 14 November 2011 01:09, Frank Gevaerts<frank_at_gevaerts.be> wrote:
>>> If someone could come up with a way to make OFFSETTYPE() actually *do*
>>> something (a clever way to do type checking, maybe), I'd agree. The way
>>> it stands now it's just as easy to overlook as a comment when changing
>>> things, and *nothing* will complain (the thing given there doesn't even
>>> have to be a valid type...).
>>>
>> At a minimum it is needed so the same maasive rework isnt needed in
>> the theme editor.
> Ok, so OFFSETTYPE() allows us to compile the code with plain traditional
> pointers if and where we want to. This could also allow more thorough
> checking of the types in the code.
>
> Those seem worthwhile to me, so I'm fine with this part of the patch
> (I haven't looked deeply at the rest)
>

I agree. Comments can't do that.

Best regards.
Received on 2011-11-13