|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Should the sim compile cleanly in Cygwin using i686-w64-mingw32-gcc?Re: Should the sim compile cleanly in Cygwin using i686-w64-mingw32-gcc?
From: Boris Gjenero <boris.gjenero_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:50:15 -0500 On 05/12/2011 12:53 PM, Rafaël Carré wrote: > Le Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:37:20 -0500, > Boris Gjenero<boris.gjenero_at_gmail.com> a écrit : >> Some other warnings are due to use of z in format specifiers, for >> printing size_t data. This warning is false for things displayed on the >> simulated device (eg. panicf()), but z really does not work when >> printing directly to standard output (eg. DEBUGF()). > > if you define __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO then the unix format specifiers > should be used instead of incompatible microsoft format (and %zu should work) Yes, that makes DEBUGF() work. However, the resulting #define for printf breaks ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF, like you reported here: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.w64.general/3554 It doesn't seem like MinGW-64 will be using the patch you posted. I just tried i686-pc-mingw32-gcc because of the other response by Magnus Holmgren. It works much better. The only warnings relate to format specifiers, and z in DEBUGF() works without any additional defines. I guess the best course of action is to use i686-pc-mingw32-gcc and not bother fixing stuff for i686-w64-mingw32-gcc. There doesn't seem to be any way to tell gcc that some printf-like function supports a different set of format specifiers. Those warnings can only be turned off completely via -Wno-format. Configure should add that option that when Windows sim. Those warnings aren't very useful anyways, because gcc doesn't know what Rockbox format() supports. Regards, Boris Received on 2011-12-05 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |