Rockbox mail archive
Subject: Re: Should the sim compile cleanly in Cygwin using i686-w64-mingw32-gcc?
Re: Should the sim compile cleanly in Cygwin using i686-w64-mingw32-gcc?
On 05/12/2011 12:53 PM, Rafaël Carré wrote:
> Le Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:37:20 -0500,
> Boris Gjenero<boris.gjenero_at_gmail.com> a écrit :
>> Some other warnings are due to use of z in format specifiers, for
>> printing size_t data. This warning is false for things displayed on the
>> simulated device (eg. panicf()), but z really does not work when
>> printing directly to standard output (eg. DEBUGF()).
> if you define __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO then the unix format specifiers
> should be used instead of incompatible microsoft format (and %zu should work)
Yes, that makes DEBUGF() work. However, the resulting #define for printf
breaks ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF, like you reported here:
It doesn't seem like MinGW-64 will be using the patch you posted.
I just tried i686-pc-mingw32-gcc because of the other response by Magnus
Holmgren. It works much better. The only warnings relate to format
specifiers, and z in DEBUGF() works without any additional defines. I
guess the best course of action is to use i686-pc-mingw32-gcc and not
bother fixing stuff for i686-w64-mingw32-gcc.
There doesn't seem to be any way to tell gcc that some printf-like
function supports a different set of format specifiers. Those warnings
can only be turned off completely via -Wno-format. Configure should add
that option that when Windows sim. Those warnings aren't very useful
anyways, because gcc doesn't know what Rockbox format() supports.
Received on 2011-12-05
Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew