Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: HWCODEC
From: Frank Gevaerts <frank_at_gevaerts.be>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:07:12 +0100
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:13:06AM +0100, Amaury Pouly wrote:
> I do not quite agree. Apart from the slow rising bin size here and there,
> the big steps were caused by functionality useless on HWCODEC mostly (UI,
> corealloc, others ?) and it will continue this way. We don't want to stop
> progress because some target doesn't have enough memory.
Why are these useless on HWCODEC?
Also, memory really isn't the decider. The clip and especially the c200v2
have exactly the same memory constraints.
-- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. KernighanReceived on 2011-12-15