|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: pluginsRe: plugins
From: Hayden Pearce <saint.lascivious_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:12:57 +1300 Apart from test_*, what plugins actually are "useful" for RaaA? Perhaps vbrfix too...certainly not many. The new Samsung application target is really a "special case" as far as I'm aware as I'm not certain its a given that there will be a native application available to replace said plugins as there is with say, RaaAoA. If the host can offer a better alternative, I'm not sure its wise to even attempt to compete. In the situations where the host can't, however...this may be viewed differently. [Saint] On Feb 3, 2012 9:48 AM, "Thomas Martitz" <kugel_at_rockbox.org> wrote: > Am 02.02.2012 21:08, schrieb Marcin Bukat: > >> 2) Relax the requirements for target to become stable. I mean we could >> agree on minimal subset of plugins (and documentation in manual) >> needed for a given port to fulfill stable criteria. Rockbox is about >> playing music and not playing games and watching rotating cube after >> all. >> > > I didn't think "all plugins work perfectly" was a requirement for > stable...because that's an unreasonable one. I agree that plugins are not > nearly as important as playback abilities. > > In that sense I would tend to agree. But who decides which subset? I think > we want at least some (useful) plugins, otherwise we end up with stable > ports which have 0 plugins (+ some test plugins perhaps). Maybe those we > work with PLA and/or don't need bitmaps. Or a list of the most useful ones > (something what I would like for RaaA too). > > Best regards. > Received on 2012-02-02 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |