Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Typedef rule
Re: Typedef rule
From: Thomas Martitz <kugel_at_rockbox.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:15:45 +0100
Am 29.11.2013 12:11, schrieb Bertrik Sikken:
>> Therefore I propose that we relax the typedef rule and allow typedefs
>> for integral types (only) when reasonable. This would basically be
>> adopting the Linux kernel guideline w.r.t. to typedefs, except they
>> allow typedefs for "totally opaque objects (where the typedef is
>> actively used to _hide_ what the object is)."
> I do not object to this, sounds reasonable.
Thanks, but did you see my follow-up? Do you object to that?
Received on 2013-11-29