|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: Typedef ruleRe: Typedef rule
From: Thomas Martitz <kugel_at_rockbox.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:15:45 +0100 Am 29.11.2013 12:11, schrieb Bertrik Sikken: > ... >> Therefore I propose that we relax the typedef rule and allow typedefs >> for integral types (only) when reasonable. This would basically be >> adopting the Linux kernel guideline w.r.t. to typedefs, except they >> allow typedefs for "totally opaque objects (where the typedef is >> actively used to _hide_ what the object is)." > ... > > I do not object to this, sounds reasonable. > Thanks, but did you see my follow-up? Do you object to that? Best regards. Received on 2013-11-29 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |