Rockbox.org home
release
dev builds
extras
themes manual
wiki
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
patches
dev guide



Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: Typedef rule

Re: Typedef rule

From: Thomas Martitz <kugel_at_rockbox.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:15:45 +0100

Am 29.11.2013 12:11, schrieb Bertrik Sikken:
> ...
>> Therefore I propose that we relax the typedef rule and allow typedefs
>> for integral types (only) when reasonable. This would basically be
>> adopting the Linux kernel guideline w.r.t. to typedefs, except they
>> allow typedefs for "totally opaque objects (where the typedef is
>> actively used to _hide_ what the object is)."
> ...
>
> I do not object to this, sounds reasonable.
>

Thanks, but did you see my follow-up? Do you object to that?

Best regards.
Received on 2013-11-29


Page was last modified "Jan 10 2012" The Rockbox Crew
aaa