On Wednesday, 18. June 2014 09:02:15 Peter wrote:
> On 18. 6. 2014 8:51, Jonathan Gordon wrote:
> > On 18 June 2014 16:25, Thomas Martitz <kugel_at_rockbox.org
> >
> > <mailto:kugel_at_rockbox.org>> wrote:
> > I think we should still have a formal freeze period with RC builds.
> > There are some open bugs that we can address too, perhaps. Alex is
> > inactive so I don't think we have a release manager.
> >
> > Considering the state of the project (activity definitely seems low
> > generally - just look at http://www.rockbox.org/since-4weeks.html) I
> > think a freeze period is a waste of time. If someone is interested in
> > freezing I would suggest just picking a commit and tagging it.
>
> I think that short freeze period is fine, for localizers who may want to
> update translations. i will post slovak lang update during this week.
> Btw thanks for this flash of life in this project, Rockbox is really
> great software and I am happy that it still lives.

I'm also happy to do a N900 and OpenPandora release
once we reach a final state.

A short code freeze period is nice for the devs since it gives
them a bit of time to test it in daily use (at least speaking for me ;)).

Cheers,
Thomas
Received on 2014-06-18