|
Rockbox mail archiveSubject: Re: buflib handling in picture flow pluginRe: buflib handling in picture flow plugin
From: Thomas Jarosch <tomj_at_simonv.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 21:47:08 +0100 Am Sonntag, 22. Februar 2015, 21:31:14 schrieb Thomas Martitz: > > thanks for the review. I noticed the same thing a few days after > > committing it. It occupied my mind why it wasn't crashing before ;) > > Do you think we should revert it or keep it? It won't hurt I guess. > > > > Did you have a chance to look at the other buflib changes I did? > > They should be correct IMHO. > > IMO, yes, it should be reverted, because adds unecessary overhead and > gives the false impression that callbacks are always required. > > I didn't notice other problems with your buflib related commits but I > maybe missed some. Do you want me to look at a particular change? alright, I'll revert it the next days. Everything is fine with the other commits from my point of view. Cheers, Thomas Received on 2015-02-22 Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy |