dev builds
themes manual
device status forums
mailing lists
IRC bugs
dev guide

Rockbox mail archive

Subject: Re: Moving services

Re: Moving services

From: Frank Gevaerts via rockbox-dev <>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:24:12 +0200

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:23:40PM +0200, Björn Stenberg via rockbox-dev wrote:
> Hello all patient devs.
> I'm thinking this might be a good time to grab the bull by the horns and do what has needed doing for quite some time: Move parts of our infrastructure away from having me as a project bottleneck.

I agree. We need to do something, and I think we need to move to an
external hosting system. We do not have the manpower to manage our own
any more. I'm aware of a few hosting providers, which all have
advantages and disadvantages. I'll list what I can come up with (in no
particular order). Feel free to add what you know!

* "everyone" knows how to use it, a lot of tutorials online
* Closed source
* Some people dislike the standard github workflow

* Less known than github
* "Open core". Unclear to me how much of what they run is actually open.
* Some people dislike the standard gitlab workflow
* I can't find hosted projects or information about open source hosting
  on their website. Maybe I'm just looking in the wrong place, but they
  seem *heavily* oriented towards selling private instances and not so
  much towards "community hosting"
* Not the best reliability track record

* Yes, they still exist, and they do git these days

* They do git hosting (
* Even the launchpad home page ( isn't aware
  that they do git hosting.


"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
Received on 2017-04-24

Page template was last modified "Tue Sep 7 00:00:02 2021" The Rockbox Crew -- Privacy Policy